+syntax_change_draft

documentation/syntax_change_draft.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+## Problem
+    + we have a serious problem expressing high level statements inline
+
+## Fix ideas
+    + blocks
+    + lisp on crack
+
+## Lisp on crack
++ this solution also allows for inline machine code
+```Lisp
+(set a (
+    (add
+        (long_ass_function_call 10)
+        (even_longer_function_call 12)
+    )
+))
+```
+NOTE: prefixmaxxing is retarded
+
+we want to be able to separate to statements
+```eax
+a = (
+        long_ass_function_call 10
+        +
+        even_longer_function_call 12
+    )
+# means
+a = ((long_ass_function_call 10) + (even_longer_function_call))
+# or
+#  (which is obviously ugly as fuck,
+#   but must be valid work
+#   unless you explicitly prohibit ';' in parens)
+a = (long_ass_function_call 10; + even_longer_function_call 12)
+# ------------------
+# ------------------
+# ------------------
+nop; mov eax 60
+mov eax,
+    60
+# same as
+(nop) (mov eax 60)
+(mov
+    60
+    eax
+)
+# --- NOTE: this is valid TCL :>
+printf "%d: %s" \
+       10 \
+       "something"
+# it does have a no trailing . allowed problem tho
+# so what if '|' is an explicit terminator?
+printf "%s and %s" \
+       "Alpha" \
+       "Beta" \
+       ;
+# now the two arguments are easy to edit (swap)
+```